Subj : Re: Non-strictly-conforming and unspecified versus undefined behavior
To   : comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Wed Feb 23 2005 10:46 am


Gianni Mariani wrote:
[...]
> You're solution is still too restrictive.  I can't create virtual
> objects in that shared memory of yours.

Not portably. Simply put, because it involves sharing of C++ runtime 
stuff you don't control portably. But idiotic semantics you seem to 
like so much are even less portable.

regards,
alexander.

.