Subj : Re: Requirements imposed for non-strictly-conforming programs
To   : comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c
From : Douglas A. Gwyn
Date : Tue Feb 22 2005 09:01 am

 <421628FF.E966EBB0@null.net> <gEBRd.83932$68.14745@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:35:10 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com comp.programming.threads:48976 comp.std.c:66644

David Hopwood wrote:
> It seems that you're not disputing the main point that C99 imposes
> requirements for programs that are not strictly conforming (and that
> POSIX imposes requirements for programs that are not Strictly Conforming
> POSIX Applications). Why not just say so?

Because I needed to refute the claim that the mention of
"a correct program" has any conformance ramifications.

.