Subj : Re: Non-strictly-conforming and unspecified versus undefined behavior
To   : comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c
From : Alexander Terekhov
Date : Mon Feb 21 2005 10:26 am


David Schwartz wrote:
[...]
>     Honestly, I cannot tell what you're talking about.

lvalues referring to objects with thread storage duration.

> 
>     Also, the implication that a person likes the implementation
> possibilities he warns about is bogus. If I said you shouldn't assume 'char'
> is signed by default, would you argue that I somehow prefer unsigned
> characters over signed ones?

Sorry, I meant the author of "I liked the SGI Irix way where the 
same address was mapped to different pysical memory for each thread." 
statement, not you.

regards,
alexander.

.