Subj : Re: Stability of SM
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : John Bandhauer <jband@netscape.com>
Date : Tue Jan 28 2003 11:07 am

I can't comment on the numbers of new users or their level of 
understanding or satisfaction. I can say that SpiderMonkey has 
been quite stable for a long time. Unfortunately, the 
documentation is lacking in many areas. But, there is a rich 
history of detailed answers to questions on this newsgroup. I 
imagine that many people are finding their answers by digging 
through this newsgroup rather than posting new versions of old 
questions.

John.

Shanti Rao wrote:
> Howdy y'all,
> 
> I'm noticing a marked decrease in the density and severity of 
> SpiderMonkey questions in this group. Does this mean that SM 1.5 is 
> stable, that the available documentation is adequate, that there are no 
> more new users, or that fewer people are using it?
> 
> Just curious,
> 
> Shanti
>

.