Subj : Re: W3C DOM ECMAscript test suite errors -- already reported?
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.qa.browser,netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : Bob Clary
Date : Sat May 28 2005 03:41 am

Ian Graham wrote:

> Thanks -- it;s a bit disconcerting to have to verify that a conformance 
> test is accurate, but I somehow suspected that might be the case.  Bob 
> -- is your partial list of failures available online somewhere??

<http://bclary.com/2005/05/28/domts.txt.gzip>

Each line has as format like:

domts: DOMTS {level} {spec} [{loader}, {mimetype}] : message

Note the failures due to the test expecting a relative URI while we 
provide an absolute one; failures due to the test expecting an HTML DOM 
to return uppercase test when the mime type is XHTML or XML and we 
return lowercase.

Unfortunately, this test run crapped out after crashing in DOM Level 2 
Core so DOM Level 1 is not represented in this report at all.

I will soon be doing test runs on "pure" builds pulled from CVS along 
with test runs on "test" builds which have candidate patches applied. In 
several cases this will help a) get the patch evaluated for check in and 
b) give us more coverage of the DOM.

Hopefully soon, these test run logs will be available on a regular basis 
for everyone.

Bob

.