Subj : Re: W3C DOM ECMAscript test suite errors -- already reported? To : Bob Clary From : Ian Graham Date : Fri May 27 2005 10:33 pm Bob Clary wrote: > Brendan Eich wrote: > >> Ian Graham wrote: >> >>> I recently ran the W3C's DOM ECMAscript (JSUnit-based) test suite on >>> Mozilla 1.7.x and Deer Park Alpha 1, and noted a bunch of failures / >>> errors. >>> >>> Are these already logged in Bugzilla somewhere? I couldn't find any , >>> but figured they must be there somewhere... >> >> >> >> >> I believe Bob Clary has done the same. Bcc'ing him to spare his email >> some spam, but I bet he will followup here. >> > > Yes, I had actually written a reply to his post but after I realized he > was using a munged email decided it wasn't worth it. > > We have a number of bugs filed on issues which are related to > conformance to the various DOM Specs. You can find them (along with alot > of others) by querying bugzilla for Core:DOM*. Unfortunately we don't > have an easy way to flag which bugs are strictly related to conformance > issues. > > Regarding the DOM TS, be sure you are using an up to date cvs version of > the W3 DOM TS. In addition, there are many errors in the W3 DOM TS which > cause us to either fail tests or experience errors depending on the > loader and the mime type used. Before filing new bugs, please make sure > that a) a bug hasn't already been filed and b) that the test itself > isn't wrong. > > I have a partial list of failures of Mozilla Firefox (Deer Park) from > yesterday for DOM 1/2 Core/HTML/Events for each of the loader types and > mime types if anyone is interested. It is not complete due to bug > 292717, but is a good starting point. In the near future I will be > making full test results for the DOM TS available on a regular basis. > > I would also recommend that anyone interested in filing bugs against > Mozilla (Firefox)? get jst and others in the DOM Community involved to > see what they would like done. > > Bob Thanks -- it;s a bit disconcerting to have to verify that a conformance test is accurate, but I somehow suspected that might be the case. Bob -- is your partial list of failures available online somewhere?? .