Subj : Re: Rhino... WHICH licence is required??
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : Attila Szegedi
Date : Mon May 16 2005 01:16 pm

On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:41:59 +0200, <igor.bukanov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Silvan Gehrig wrote:
>> Okay, thus I should preserve this part of code. Stupid question:
>> Is it relicening if I publish the adapted code under the MPL again?
>
> Rhino is only licensed under NPL 1.1/LGPL, it is NOT licensed under
> MPL, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236108 .
>

I must admit I didn't read through all of the above Bugzilla issue - could  
you quickly summarize it for me? All Rhino CVS HEAD source files specify  
that Rhino is primarily licensed under NPL, but that it is also  
distributable under GPL. The source files don't say LGPL, but GPL.

Is the essence of the Bugzilla issue you referenced that it exchanged the  
NPL/GPL licensing for NPL/LGPL licensing?

Attila.

-- 
home: http://www.szegedi.org
weblog: http://www.jroller.com/page/aszegedi
Visit Szegedi Butterfly fractals at:
   http://www.szegedi.org/fractals/butterfly/index.html

.