Subj : Re: Rhino... WHICH licence is required??
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : Silvan Gehrig
Date : Thu May 12 2005 11:13 pm

Hi Igor

>it is NOT licensed under MPL
ooops *pain*... I'm sorry
(you're right, rhino src-files contain NPL headers)

LGPL (Lesser General Public License) sounds really good...
And I think commercial use of the software package makes sense.

<http://www.opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-license.php>

Thx for your reply and cheers

Silvan


<igor.bukanov@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:1115905319.735551.244160@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Silvan Gehrig wrote:
>> Okay, thus I should preserve this part of code. Stupid question:
>> Is it relicening if I publish the adapted code under the MPL again?
>
> Rhino is only licensed under NPL 1.1/LGPL, it is NOT licensed under
> MPL, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236108 .
>
> So AFAIK if you release your work under NPL or LGPL or under both
> licenses, then your work can include source code from Rhino. For any
> other license including MPL you have to understand what exactly
> NPL/LGPL allows your to do.
>
> Regards, Igor
>

.