Subj : Re: JS_GetClass won't return proper class name.
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : Mike Moening
Date : Tue Mar 29 2005 03:06 pm

No I used "new".
The original post has the entire code.  That code is evaluated using the
global object.
Any more ideas?

Mike M.

"Brendan Eich" <brendan@meer.net> wrote in message
news:d2c9hb$p423@ripley.netscape.com...
> Mike Moening wrote:
> >
> > In short here is what I did:
> >
> > ctor = JS_GetConstructor(cx,  JS_GetPrototype(cx, obj));
>
>
> Note that you could pass obj to JS_GetConstructor directly, so long as
> obj doesn't "shadow" the prototype 'constructor' property with a
> different-valued one of the same name.
>
>
> > Unfortunately the "results" and "n" properities show up in the
properties
> > listing twice.
> > Once standing alone and once under the Factorial "object" when I
recursively
> > call GetPropertyDescArray() on the object.
>
>
> The only reason n and results could show up on the global object is
> because you call Factorial() directly (no operator new).  Do you do
> that?  If you do, then |this| binds (as usual) to the global object -- 
> the object in which 'Factorial' was found on the scope chain.
>
> /be

.