Subj : Re: E4X support in mozilla? To : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng From : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karsten_D=FCsterloh?= Date : Sat Feb 12 2005 03:16 am Nickolay Ponomarev aber hob zu reden an und schrieb: > Brendan Eich wrote: >>In the mean while, E4X is good for use in private pages, and >>especially in JS XPCOM components and in XUL. Even without binding >>the DOM two-way that remains to be done, it's handy. > > Is E4X supposed to work in XUL scripts now? I tried to load the > following XUL file, and it didn't work (I tried it without type > attribute and from an extension; tested with 20040107 Firefox build). > Your example above (script in an HTML file) worked... > > Nick > > The XUL file: > ---- > xmlns="http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul"> > > > ---- So noone has a helpful answer to that? I, too, tested several combinations of XUL/JS/E4X, but couldn't get to work there. With HTML files it does - but in XUL files, not even 'hiding' it inside a (X)HTML namespace helps... Karsten -- Freiheit stirbt | Fsayannes SF&F-Bibliothek: Mit Sicherheit | http://fsayanne.tprac.de/ .