Subj : Re: The root of the syntax tree
To   : joao
From : Brendan Eich
Date : Wed Jul 07 2004 11:08 am

joao wrote:

> You're right, of course. I see now that the comment groups NAME, STRING,
> and OBJECT together, under the 'name' variant. But this is strange :
> when I look inside the JSParseNode, token type is TOK_STRING but
> pn_arity is PN_NULLARY, not PN_NAME... and yet, there is a
> pn_u.name.atom field. I assumed pn_arity would be the discriminating
> field for the pn_u union ?
> 
> Shouldn't the TOK_STRING have arity PN_NAME ?


Good point!  I'll fix this nit when the trunk opens again.

/be

.