Subj : Re: spidermonkey docu To : Sterling Bates From : Brendan Eich Date : Wed Apr 07 2004 08:44 pm Sterling Bates wrote: > "Brendan Eich" wrote in message > news:40746845.2050303@meer.net... > >>So I'm not sure why you say the doc is wrong. It is not in error, it's >>just (as usual, thanks to whoever wrote it for Netscape, ages ago) a bit >>misleading about implementation, a bit too detailed in that respect, and >>oddly not detailed enough in other ways. > > > Is there an effort (at mozdev or whereever) where people can contribute > corrects and additions? Steven's followup tells how to update the docs currently. You have to hack jsref.xml, then check in and tell me or someone with website CVS access what you've done, so I can update js/docs in my tree, run make, then copy the whole js/docs/gen directory (cp -p -r) over to my website cvs workarea, and check in changed files there. Painful. DevMo will make this easier, at which point we'll probably migrate js/docs/jsref.xml to the DevMo CVS (sub-)repository. /be .