Subj : Re: Proper behavior of uneval(-0.0) ?
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : Brendan Eich <brendan@meer.net>
Date : Wed Nov 12 2003 11:17 am

Igor Bukanov wrote:

>
> Currently in SM uneval(-0.0) gives "0". Should it be "-0.0" instead? 


Whatever we do with the sign, I see no reason to preserve the .0 after 
the 0, or any other spelling (-0.0000, e.g.).

/be

.