Subj : Re: Corrected Re: Ignore the other one
To   : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
From : "Izman" <cburdon@tampabay.rr.com>
Date : Tue Sep 16 2003 08:58 pm

Thank you again.  I figured out that the code below works, just not in the
app I placed it into.  I created a new project that is dialog based and
placed a single button on the dialog box.  I then placed the code below into
the app and attached it to the button so that when the button is pressed it
runs a predefined javascript file.  The code below works in the new app,
which says to me that something is amiss with the original app I am trying
to embed the code into.

This appears to not be a javascript engine issue or any code around the
engine, so I will try and figure out what is wrong with the original app I
was embedding the javascript engine into.  Thank you again for all your
help.


"Brendan Eich" <brendan@meer.net> wrote in message
news:3F67390F.1050600@meer.net...
> Izman wrote:
>
> >Thank you for your help Brendan.  I am using the win32 debug build of
> >js-1.5-rc5a.tar.gz file downloaded from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/js/.  I
tried using the win32 release build but it crashes my app every time I try
and use a script, even though the app and js32.dll compile with no errors or
warnings.  I use VS6 and compile through the IDE.
> >
>
> You need to link with /OPT:NOICF -- see bug
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151066 and the release
> notes.  This is necessary to work around a bug in MSVC that bites RC5
> and RC5a.
>
> >Added error checking to the constructor and set rval to the obj:
> >JSBool JSMyObject::JSConstructor(JSContext *cx, JSObject *obj,
> >                                 uintN argc, jsval *argv, jsval *rval)
> >{
> > JSMyObject *p = new JSMyObject();
> >
> > if (!p)
> >  return JS_FALSE;
> >
> >
>
> Aside: You'll want to JS_ReportOutOfMemory(cx) before returning false if
> (!p).
>
> I'm not sure why the second property is not being defined correctly.
> Could you send me the full code (including the JS and the C++), or the
> code for a reduced but complete testcase, so I can debug it?
> Alternatively, can you run a debugger on your embedding application and
> try to see what is going wrong?
>
> /be
>

.