Subj : Re: try catch blocks To : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng From : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Georg_Maa=DF?= Date : Tue May 20 2003 08:32 am Brendan Eich wrote: > I should have pointed out that hundreds may be low. I know of several > VXML object models implemented using SpiderMonkey. There are other > non-web uses that likewise benefit from extensions. Even on the web, if > you are writing for yourself and a small audience of friends (and anyone > else willing to download Mozilla), there is no evil in using extensions. But also those projects, that are allways bound to a real JavaScript implementation, need to be redesinged, if they want upgrade to JS 2.0, or JS 2.0 must keep this as extra load for backward compatibility of those projects. I do not encourage anybody to use those features, if migration to "the allways newest JS" is desired. JS 2.0 will give us a lot of useful features, we have hungered long times for like versioning and dynamic loading of libraries and all such nice stuff. In expectation of those features I try to keep my scripts also within my own application, where I my self can decide, which js.so I link to, as future compatible as possible. .