Subj : Re: try catch blocks To : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng From : Brendan Eich Date : Mon May 19 2003 10:53 am Brendan Eich wrote: >> Scratching the quicky from the wall or out of the heads is much more >> work than implementing a real solution. The unpatient shoud help >> Roger to implement JS 2.0. This is more usefull than crying for those >> hacks. > > > The people who write JS are not the people who can help implement JS2. > Millions of hackers copy and mutate snippets of JS in web pages; > thousands program significant amounts of code in it. Dozens to > hundreds write SpiderMonkey-specific code, and those people benefit > from catch guards. Many are using them now. Get over it. I should have pointed out that hundreds may be low. I know of several VXML object models implemented using SpiderMonkey. There are other non-web uses that likewise benefit from extensions. Even on the web, if you are writing for yourself and a small audience of friends (and anyone else willing to download Mozilla), there is no evil in using extensions. /be .