Subj : yeah, Rhino is very easy to use To : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng From : "Mark Turansky" Date : Mon May 12 2003 03:11 pm If you are thinking of writing your own JS Engine...... why? From The Cathedral and the Bazaar: "Good programmers know what to write. Great ones know what to rewrite (and reuse)." Even Linus Torvalds didn't start from scratch. He used Minix (sp?) as the scaffolding to create Linux. You are better off hacking at Rhino to make it suitable for your needs that to rewrite the whole thing over from scratch. Talk about reinventing a pretty big wheel... "Franky Braem" wrote in message news:3e8df1d8$0$14924$ba620e4c@reader0.news.skynet.be... > What's wrong with SpiderMonkey or Rhino ??? > > "Kang Jeong-Hee" wrote in message > news:pan.2003.04.03.08.45.07.996158@mail.co.kr... > > Hi. > > I'm not sure this place is good to post issue like this: > > I need a good-matured JavaScript interpreter. > > and I don't like to import Rhino or SpiderMonkey, at this moment. > > NJS at http://www.bbassett.net/njs/ is one of entry. > > > > and, when there's no good choice for me, > > I'll try to implement a js interpreter of my own, > > from the first line of code. > > > > then, which spec do I have to work with? > > XML has SAX, CSS has SAC, JS has what? > > > > .