Subj : Re: Possible Bug in js_NumberToString? To : netscape.public.mozilla.jseng From : "Stephen Jones" Date : Sat May 10 2003 12:51 pm I'm pretty sure it's 1.5-rc4 . . . could be rc3a, because I have both archived on my machine, but I'm pretty sure it's rc4 . . . any place I can look in the code to be sure? BTW: This only seemed to be happening on Windows, the MacX platform seemed fine. Side Note: We're extremely pleased with SpiderMonkey. We were using the Microsoft Active Scripting engine in our product and when we ported it to the Mac, we needed another solution. The speed increases we're seeing over the Microsoft engine are incredible. The static methods and garbage collection make SpiderMonkey a little difficult to deal with, but once integrated, the engine seems very solid. I heard rumor at some point of a 2.0 version. Is this in the works? We would love to see a C++ solution. Accepting any design input? Thanks for all the hard work, - Stephen "Brendan Eich" wrote in message news:3EBC2BBB.9050401@meer.net... > Stephen Jones wrote: > > >In js_NumberToString, for doubles with large mantissas, JS_dtostr ASSERTS. I > >increased the size of the buffer passed into JS_dtostr and it works > >perfectly. > >Comments? > >Thanks, > >- S > > > > > > What version of the code are you using? > > /be > > > > > > > > .