Subj : Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again) To : comp.programming From : lilburne Date : Wed Sep 21 2005 12:29 pm Antoon Pardon wrote: > Op 2005-09-21, lilburne schreef : > >>Antoon Pardon wrote: >> >> >>> >>>No it isn't. Your work wasn't stolen. You still have the knowledge >>>of your own recipe, so nothing was taken from you. >>> >>> >>> >>>No, information is not something that can be owned. >>> >>> >>>I didn't claim that it is freely shared. Nobody can be forced to >>>share what he knows. I claimed you can't treat it as property. >>> >>>If property is handed from one person to an other, the original >>>owner looses the property (although he can get something in exchange). >>>If information is handed from one person to an other, that information >>>is not lost to the first person. >>> >> >>See here is the Marxism, the absolute refusal to acknowledge that >>anything has any value other other than the material. > > > You are putting words in my mouth. > Nope! Those are your words and they are derived from Marxism. .