Subj : Re: future?
To   : comp.programming
From : Steve O'Hara-Smith
Date : Wed Sep 07 2005 11:09 pm

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 11:49:59 -0700
Alan Balmer <albalmer@att.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 11:32:16 -0700, Scott Moore
> <samiamsansspam@Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
> >johny_cage wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I want to know, what all you think about programming languages of
> >> future.
> >> Beyond 2005.
> >> Myself I've done few things in c++, object pascal, nasm, and I think
> >> that I should learn more, because even if I would be great in this
> >> languages, there would be many persons on my place, who can do this at
> >> the same or above level.
> >> 
> >
> >In the future, "$(&^$@*&&%^$" will mean "input a spread sheet"
> >from the user, manipulate the figures into graphs, and present
> >the result in 3d format".
> 
> Derived from APL, no doubt.

	OO TECO methinks.

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.                | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    licences available see
                                            |    http://www.sohara.org/

.