Subj : Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
To   : comp.programming
From : Scott Moore
Date : Tue Sep 06 2005 06:06 pm

David Golden wrote:
> Scott Moore wrote:
> 
> 
>>And again, assuming your opponents are less intellegent.
> 
> 
> I *assumed* no such thing...
> 

You have called all of us stupid several times, and clipping
what I *QUOTED* from you out of your reply won't help.
Here are *YOUR* words (from various messages in this thread):

David Golden wrote:

"Here are some URLs, the referenced documents might
help you comment more intelligently on joint ownership vs.
no ownership"

"No I'm not. Perhaps you should reread the post to which you replied and
its sibling (the sibling was the more important post actually, the post
to which you replied was mostly to offer you references to information
with which you might better inform yourself on joint ownership issues)."

"Go look up plagiarism, dolt"

[Humm, maybe you have a different definition of calling someone a "dolt"
than the rest of the planet]

"If you still can't tell the difference between information freedom
and information communism/capitalism (which are much more like eachother
than like intellectual freedom), then that's your problem."

I could go on, but basically you have called everyone here stupid about
every other article.

So we are going with denial as a debating technique ?

Say, if you can't even remember what you said in your own messages,
does that make you seem real intelligent ?

.