Subj : Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
To   : comp.programming
From : David Golden
Date : Sun Sep 04 2005 08:11 pm

Gerry Quinn wrote:


> And since you are claiming that ownership is given to the world at
> large, 
 
No I'm not. Perhaps you should reread the post to which you replied and
its sibling (the sibling was the more important post actually, the post
to which you replied was mostly to offer you references to information
with which you might better inform yourself on joint ownership issues).

Prev. post:
DG> Of course, all this is just to illustrate that communal ownership
DG> and no ownership are not at all "the same thing", I was not arguing
DG> for or against communal ownership of assumed-ownable information OR
DG> assumed-ownable stuff, particularly:   I don't agree in the first
DG> place with ownership of information considered as independent of its
DG> physical medium

.