Subj : Re: GNU Public Licences Revisited (again)
To   : comp.programming
From : David Golden
Date : Tue Aug 30 2005 10:19 am

I wrote:
>> Free markets for things notionally property do...  
>> If we don't consider software to be property in 
>> the first place, that's irrelevant.  

Gerry Quinn wrote:
> But we do, apart from the software communists.   

Actually, I think you might be persistently confusing 
"collective ownership" [1] and  "no ownership"


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
"Communism is a movement based on the principle of communal ownership of
all property."

.