Subj : Re: possible overflow?
To   : comp.programming
From : Randy Howard
Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 09:24 am

Willem wrote
(in article <slrndh5cbr.1r37.willem@toad.stack.nl>):

> Peter wrote:
>> Your assumption of ASCII is not required since the C language requires
>> the characters '0'..'9' be consecutive codings [although it does not
>> require the same for 'a'..'z' or 'A'..'Z'.]
> 
> I wasn't aware of that, so I stuck with the safer explanation of ASCII,
> which fails on 80% of all enterprise systems... 

You owe me a new keyboard.  :-)


-- 
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)

.