Subj : Re: possible overflow?
To   : comp.programming
From : Willem
Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 07:55 am

Peter wrote:
) Your assumption of ASCII is not required since the C language requires
) the characters '0'..'9' be consecutive codings [although it does not
) require the same for 'a'..'z' or 'A'..'Z'.]

I wasn't aware of that, so I stuck with the safer explanation of ASCII,
which fails on 80% of all enterprise systems... Err, I mean, works on
95% of all computers.


SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

.