Subj : Re: Lightweight application
To   : comp.programming
From : HoopsBhoy
Date : Tue Aug 23 2005 04:39 pm


Randy Howard wrote:
> hoopsbhoy67@aol.com wrote
> (in article
> <1124822431.237493.326600@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > Cheers, so that's low memory useage on the server. That's a start :)
> >
>
> If you are going to use google on Usenet, at least learn how to
> use the interface so that context is not lost in your replies.

OK Usenet Nazi!

>
> The 3GB number I used originally was not meant to be taken
> seriously.

Well duh!

>
> The real answer of what "lightweight" is depends upon the user
> of the term, and the moving target of the underlying hardware
> and system loads.  The typical approach is to just have your
> marketing department use the term ceaselessly until people start
> laughing at you, then you aren't lightweight after all.
> 

Cheers for the unhelpful comments! You Usenet guys are ace!!

.