Subj : Re: How much should I charge for fixed-price software contract? To : comp.programming From : Randy Howard Date : Sat Aug 20 2005 05:46 am Ben Pfaff wrote (in article <87slx5fszx.fsf@benpfaff.org>): > Randy Howard writes: > >> blmblm@myrealbox.com wrote >>> Yes, I have tried OpenOffice. Yes, it does a pretty >>> good job, and I'm grateful that it exists. I don't have extensive >>> experience with the most recent version, but previous versions .... >> >> It's gotten a lot better over the last year or so, but it is >> still imperfect. The powerpoint part of it is especially weak >> compared to its MS counterpart, but thankfully I don't care much >> about that anymore. > > I'm surprised that you've found much to complain about in the > OpenOffice counterpart of PowerPoint. if you use it instead of Powerpoint, and make your presentations using it instead of Powerpoit, it works fine (although it could use more than 3 templates for a fresh install, but that's a different issue). Transferring files back and forth is pretty low-joy IME. Lately, I've played around a bit with Keynote (iWork package) and it is really cool, but even less "portable", although it does allow you to export out to PDF, or even an animated flash presentation. I don't have the need or the interest to actually do that sort of thing, but it's there. > I used it to teach a > course here at Stanford this quarter. I imported the slides from > previous quarters, which had been built by the previous > instructors in PowerPoint, and had very few problems using or > modifying them with OpenOffice. A few oddities and > idiosyncrasies, yes, but nothing much to complain about. Try going the other way. I worked for several days on a slide presentation in OpenOffice, had it looking just like I wanted it to, and was going to send it to someone else with a Windows system to look at. I saved it off in Powerpoint file format (.ppt), opened it up on a Windows system with the real deal, and it looked like crap. Just about everything turned out funky. I wound up basically overhauling about 90% of it on Windows and then sending it on from there. It could have just been a particular style or layout issue that didn't make the trip over. It would have been much less painful to just send it as a pdf file instead. -- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) .