Subj : Re: How much should I charge for fixed-price software contract? To : comp.programming From : Randy Howard Date : Fri Aug 19 2005 12:41 pm Richard Heathfield wrote (in article ): > Randy Howard wrote: > >> I am always amazed at how completely you abhor PDF files, but I >> can't recall exactly why. > > For one thing, I don't like the idea of promulgating an Adobe format, > given Adobe's shameful treatment of Dmitri Sklyarov a few years ago. I'm certain that someone working on the Linux kernel was mean to their mother somewhere along the way too, but I won't boycott Linux over it. Not that the DS situation was equivalent in severity. > Also, of course, they're a nuisance to read (for example, ghostview quite > often complains about PDFs being corrupt). then using something else, or patch out the popup. :-) > As for editing them, forget it. Aha.. now you've hit on something, but I have the opposite view. I like to use PDF's specifically for when I don't want a file to be edited. for example, during arguing back and forth over an RFQ or design document, contracts, etc., fine, use something easily mutable. But, when it comes time for a real signed copy of the file you have agreed to, a PDF file makes it a little less likely that they'll modify it and hand you back something not exactly what you expected. For forms, or other documents where you don't want some personal style settings, fonts, margins or whatever to hose the form layout, PDF also comes in handy. Of course, you are opposed to it for emotional reasons also, so I suspect this is pointless. The world will continue to spin on its axis regardless of the outcome. > On the other hand, text files are non-proprietary, easy to read, easy to > import into your own programs, easy to edit, and easy to create. Quite true. It's also more difficult to make them convey as much visual information unless you intend to post process them into something graphical before viewing. > PDF or a text format? No contest, as far as I'm concerned. I see no problem with both, at different times for different purposes. -- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) .