Subj : Re: Really **wonderful** website for C interview questions!!!!!
To   : comp.programming
From : Willem
Date : Mon Jul 04 2005 07:33 pm

Robert wrote:
)
) "Willem" <willem@stack.nl> wrote in message
) news:slrndcgmak.2e1g.willem@toad.stack.nl...
)> Robert wrote:
)> ) Okay. I guess I *am* a novice. How is
)> )
)> ) if(x == (!!y) )
)> ) any more useful (or clear) than
)> )
)> ) if(x && y)
)>
)> Well, for starters those two statements don't have the same meaning,
)> even for boolean values...
)>
)
) Well, yes. You're right. I realized after sending I should've used
)
) if ( (!!x) == (!!y) )
)
) for the first case. Does that make the question I asked answerable?

No.  They still don't have the same boolean-logic meaning.
Why don't you write out a truth-table for '&&' and '==' ?


SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

.