Subj : Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
To   : comp.programming,comp.object
From : Chris Sonnack
Date : Tue Jun 28 2005 01:37 pm

topmind writes:

> Brush Teeth
> ....*.find.toothbrush
> ....*.find.toothpaste.tube
> ....*.open.toothpaste.tube
> ..........o.Put.thumb.and.pointer.finger.on.cap
> ..........o.turn.fingers.counter-clockwise.
> ....*.clean.teeth
> ..........o.put.brush.on.teeth
> ..........o.move.back.and.fourth.vigorously
> ..........o.repeat.above.step.100.times.
> ....*.clean.up
> ..........o.rinse.brush
> ................+.turn.on.water
> ................+.put.head.of.brush.under
> ..................running.water.for.30.seconds
> ................+.turn.off.water.
> ..........o.put.cap.back.on.toothpaste
> ..........o.put.all.items.back.in.cabinet
> 
> Most people would produce a fiarly similar hierarchy without even
> seeing this one.

LOL!  You mean to say it is so naturally tree-shaped that most people
would naturally produce a tree?

-- 
|_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? |
|_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL  |
|_____________________________________________|_______________________|

.