Subj : Re: cputs does not work in graphics-modi ? To : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp From : R.Wieser Date : Fri Sep 23 2005 02:45 am Bob Gonder schreef in berichtnieuws is9bi1tr0pptl7n3a5qi0of2ev9ffskim3@4ax.com... > R.Wieser wrote: Hello Bob, > >Maybe you can't tell, but I do not really like to be told "it's in the > >specs" when I have no means to verify it. Too easy that way to claim > >bloody anything. > > And it is rather rude to come here hat-in-hand and call us liars just > because the truth doesn't fit with your expectations. Expectations ? I might have got little experience with C(++), I've got quite some experience with Assembly, and I've been using INT 10h-calls for ages (from when a 286 16 Mhz was top-of-the-bill). Liars ? What I asked for was documentation substanciating a claim. If that is enough for you to accuse me of calling anyone a liar, so be it. Just so you know : the moon is made of green cheese, and all the appollo-missions (landing on the moon) have never happened, but where taped here on earth, in a film-studio. Not true ? Want substanciation ? You're not going to call me a liar, are you ? :-) > If you don't trust us, then don't ask us. > Get the docs and read them for yourself. There are just too many documents about C(++) on the web. You do not really expect me to work thru all of them, trying to find one that supports your claim (if there is one), only to than to negate it ? That's just plain silly (un-workable). You did the claim, you *should* be able to point me to the documents substanciating it. As I said before, I don't like to "just have" to believe something someone (even from a respected member in this newsgroup like you) said. Especially not when being *told* to do so. Regards, Rudy Wieser P.s You said "It works precisely as documented". Do you mind to tell me where I can find that document / those documents ? And please, don't send me on a wild "use Google !" goose-chase. As mentioned in the above, that would be silly for me to do. .