Subj : Re: bcc 5.02 command line v. ide To : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp From : Sebastian Ledesma Date : Fri Dec 03 2004 11:51 am David: I have Open Watcom 1.2, and four weeks ago I upgraded to Open Watcom 1.3. The IDE is no such thing. It's basically a project manager, when you double click to edit a file it will open a separate application (I'm not sure if it can be configured to select the editor). In any case you have to press ALT+TAB several times to go from 'editing' to 'compiling' and viceversa. I didnt trid the debugger. I used a lot to make some specific 32 bit DOS applications. When I finished my work I switched back to BC :-). So, that's my opinion, the IDE it's not a real INTEGRATED Developement Enviroment. But the code Works, and the extenders are great. Perhaps the best solution it's to integrate the compiler/libraries in another Addon like Tools55 :-) (Watcom Addon for BC5.x! :-) ) or wait until release 1.x becomes a real IDE. Saludos Sebastian "David Morris" escribió en el mensaje news:41b010c0@newsgroups.borland.com... > > " > > > Co-incidentally I had a look at (some screen shots) of RHIDE yesterday. As a > DOS application it looked great. I would have loved it back in 1994. Today, > I really want a Windows IDE, that has a an editor that is fast and compact with > lots of different languages supported. The Editor I want is close to Crimson > (http://www.crimsoneditor.com/). But the IDE has not been invented yet. PSPad > (http://www.pspad.com/index_en.html )comes close - but I think that the SYN > component just isn't as good as Crimson, and it doesn't give me the same > confidence. > > I liked the Watcom compiler because it is well supported by well known (and > presumably) good DMPI extenders. Also, has anyone done any benchmarking > between DJGPP and Watcom? Historically the Watcom compiler was known to > generate fast code. > > I could see a day when the same code base produces Borland 16bit DOS (and that > won't change),32 DOS bit Watcom?, and 32 bit Win with Visual C. > > There is an amazing number of good and even good free compilers out there. > > regards DM > .