Subj : Re: Opinion Question - is there a preference for the various versions?
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : D Kat
Date : Tue Oct 05 2004 02:48 pm

Thank you.  I have 5.02 and will take your recommendation.

I debug DOS apps from windows using 3.0 - problem being very small DOS 
window and none of the printing capabilities I have with Builder  (of course 
that is  commenting out all the functions that use boards that are not used 
in Windows...).


"Sebastian Ledesma" <labo_no_sp@m_solidyne1.com> wrote in message 
news:4162d5c6@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Hi D-Kat:
>
> Except for the case that you cannot debug DOS app. from Windows IDE, 
> Borland
> C++ 5.x is far the best of Borland C++ family.
> I suggest you to look for Borland C++ 5.02 Devevloper Suite at ebay or
> similar. We have BC3.x, 4.x and 5.x, for sometime we have
> BC4.5 and 5.02 installed (just for support old 16 bit apps), when my disk
> becomes full I erased BC4.5 and only use BC5.02 for all
> projects.
>
>
> Saludos
> Sebastian
>
> "D Kat" <disisdkat@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:4162cf9c$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> I use Builder 5 for my windows apps and borland C++ 3.0 for my DOS apps.
> I
>> have been using 3.0 for years even though I have upgraded almost every
>> upgrade Borland put out - I was confortable with 3.0 and 3.1, etc had
>> problems.  I want to run a borland C++ from windows now and 3.0 doesn't
> give
>> me some of the capabilities I want.  I have heard the 5 has issues but
> that
>> 4.5 is OK.  Any input would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>
>

.