Subj : Re: Borland CPP 4.53 vs 5.02 To : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp From : Ron Croonenberg Date : Tue Mar 30 2004 01:48 pm That's actually what I am confused about, I don't have any "modules.h" file mentioned in the source. I have th eimpression that it gets loaded somewhere in another header file. It is a win16 app. the only thing I can imagine is that I have some setting wrong somewhere inthe ide file or something. I'll find a code excerpt and post it here. thanks, Ron Ed Mulroy [TeamB] wrote: > I do not have a machine with BC++ 4.5* loaded. But I looked at one > where TC++ for Windows 4.5 is loaded and the set of include files for > it should be the same as for BC++. I also looked at one where BC++ > 5.02 was loaded. Neither of them had a compiler-supplied file named > modules.h. > > In all of TC++ for Windows 4.5, BC++ 5.02, C++ Builder versions 4 & 6, > C++ BuilderX 1, Turbo C 2.01 and Turbo C++ 1.01 the only 'modules.h' > that I could find was a source file used to build Boost's jam program. > Where did the modules.h that you are using come from? > > Please show the source file lines listing the includes down through > the one including modules.h Also show the section of modules.h about > which it is complaining. > > . Ed > > >>Ron Croonenberg wrote in message >>news:4068346f$1@newsgroups.borland.com... >> >>I have an old application that was build under borland 4.53. I >>moved on to another place and want to recompile it again, but >>we only have a license for 5.02 >> >>For some reason "it" doesn't just want to compile. Are there >>any settings that I am overlooking ? (When compiling "it" is >>complaining about headerfiles : "modules.h : Enum syntax >>error" >> >> >>isd there a setting (or something) that can be changed ? can >>"something" be automatically converted ? >> >>any info would be greatly appreciated. > > > .