Subj : Re: Borland CPP  4.53 vs 5.02
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : "Ed Mulroy [TeamB]" <dont_email_me@bitbuc.ket>
Date : Mon Mar 29 2004 11:24 am

I do not have a machine with BC++ 4.5* loaded.  But I looked at one
where TC++ for Windows 4.5 is loaded and the set of include files for
it should be the same as for BC++.  I also looked at one where BC++
5.02 was loaded.  Neither of them had a compiler-supplied file named
modules.h.

In all of TC++ for Windows 4.5, BC++ 5.02, C++ Builder versions 4 & 6,
C++ BuilderX 1, Turbo C 2.01 and Turbo C++ 1.01 the only 'modules.h'
that I could find was a source file used to build Boost's jam program.
Where did the modules.h that you are using come from?

Please show the source file lines listing the includes down through
the one including modules.h  Also show the section of modules.h about
which it is complaining.

..  Ed

> Ron Croonenberg wrote in message
> news:4068346f$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> I have an old application that was build under borland 4.53.  I
> moved on to another place and want to recompile it again, but
> we only have a license for 5.02
>
> For some reason "it" doesn't just want to compile. Are there
> any settings that I am overlooking ? (When compiling "it" is
> complaining about headerfiles : "modules.h : Enum syntax
> error"
>
>
> isd there a setting (or something) that can be changed ?  can
> "something" be automatically converted ?
>
> any info would be greatly appreciated.

.