Subj : Re: Win98 error
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : maeder@glue.ch (Thomas Maeder [TeamB])
Date : Tue Mar 16 2004 08:20 pm

Bob Gonder <notbg@notmindspring.invalid> writes:

> Whereas you demonstrated
> BYTE const  b27
> Your contention was that '27' (the define) is an 'int' and that ByteB
> would be promoted (it wasn't).

It was. At the language level. The compiler just did a good job at
optimizing.

.