Subj : Re: Win98 error
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : Bob Gonder <notbg@notmindspring.invalid>
Date : Sat Mar 13 2004 02:10 pm

Thomas Maeder [TeamB] wrote:

>Bob Gonder <notbg@notmindspring.invalid> writes:
>
>> Also doesn't need to promote, say s to an int.
>
>s will be promoted for comparison to both the macro and the const version of
>nmax.

Then it must be brain dead.
I'd expect   if( ByteB < 27 ) to be a byte comparison.
Maybe I'm wrong. Could be. Compilers have disappointed me for years
which is why I stayed with ASM for so long.

>namespace
>{
>  int i(10);
>}
>
>, which makes much more sense. The name of the variable i now has a name
>which is "unutterable" in different translation units (.cpp files). Even if
>another translation unit contains the same variable definition, the two
>variables don't clash.

Yeah, but they already had "private" and "public" keywords, and they
_really_ make sense.

.