Subj : Re: reentrant fwrite/fputc/etc ?
To   : borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp
From : Andrue Cope <not.a.valid@email.address.sorry>
Date : Mon Nov 17 2003 12:16 pm

Gary,

> a function is either 
> "reentrant" or it is "non-reentrant", meaning that it does or doesn't 
> support being "reentered" without the second call screwing up what the 
> first call was in the middle of doing.
>

I think you're missing my point entirely. The point I was making was that 
you might get away with it sufficiently often as to believe that the RTL 
(or parts of it) are intended to be re-rentrant. I don't think any part 
of the RTL is intended to be reentrant.

--
Andrue Cope
[Bicester, UK]

.