Subj : Compression question To : Jerry Schwartz From : Peter Knapper Date : Thu Jul 24 2003 09:58 pm Hi Jerry, JS> From the Squish documentation: ... removed for brevity ... JS> mail archive to 123/456 using the crash flavour. You are right, thats what the documentation says about the SEND command, however I note that it does not say EXACTLY the same thing about the ROUTE command, and I also know from practical experience that the Squish Docs appear to be wrong on this point, because I NEVER process anything in NORMAL Flavour. My belief in this happened within a few weeks of moving from a DOS based Single-line system, to an OS/2 based Multi-line system, around 1992 I think. When I ran a single line DOS based system, my ROUTE.CFG file was built "according to the book", and it seemed to work fine. The moment I moved to OS/2 and went Multi-line, I started having all sorts of wierd (intermittent) mail routing/processing problems (mail would head off to another Hub, then return and be distributed like it should have the first time). I quickly altered all my ROUTE.CFG Schedules to the format I use today - 1. CHANGE all mail into HOLD Flavour, 2. Manipulate all mail using only HOLD Flavour, 3. Then CHANGE the HOLD to whatever output Flavour I needed, and Squish has run perfect since I did that. Incidently, I NEVER use NORMAL anywhere in my SQUISH PROCESSING (except perhaps for a final CHANGE to NORMAL), and Squish has processed my mail fine for 10+ years since I stopped trying to use SEND and ROUTE with CRASH/NORMAL/DIRECT flavours, and use only the HOLD flavour. My mail processing always uses the above sequence in each Schedule. JS> Note the repeated reference to "normal-flavoured." JS> That's how I have always found it to work. Yes, it works like that, but not always... The failures I experienced were not common, but I certainly experienced them, and changing to my processing method above cured it 100%. JS> The only commands which operate on anything but normal-flavoured JS> mail are LEAVE, UNLEAVE, and CHANGE. This is mentioned JS> repeatedly in the documentation of each command. Then why has Squish correctly processed my SEND and ROUTE statements using a Flavour of HOLD for both input and output packets, for 10+ years? I would be interested to hear if someone checked the Squish code on this, I would guess they might find a few things slightly different to what the docs say. JS> The example you gave doesn't help, because I don't know JS> what the DEFINEs do and because I don't know how the JS> mail is flavored by your message editor. The DEFINES only contain a list of the nodes to process for each command and no FLAVOUR or other values at all. I use several different SCHEDULES, however most require very similar Node relationships, hence why I use common DEFINES for them. Cheers...............pk. --- Maximus/2 3.01 * Origin: Another Good Point About OS/2 (3:772/1.10) .