Subj : Forward File routing To : Joe Davis From : Matt Bedynek Date : Mon Jul 21 2003 11:23 pm Hello Joe. 21 Jul 03 13:19, you wrote to all: File forwarding has likely not been used extensively because in the past nobody wanted to burdon the cost of routing files for others. I suspect that it is indeed a bug. If you discover that is such a case, you can use a netmail tracking that provides such capabilities, such a Ftracker. JD> I've inquired about this in the past, and have looked into it on a JD> couple different occasions, with no success. JD> I want mention it again, here, now, just in case it is a bug. JD> Perhaps just knowing it is there, it might get worked out sometime in JD> the future. JD> Using: SQUISH/386 SquishMail Conference Processor, Version 1.11. JD> 1-01-99 3:02a 146878 0 SQ386P.EXE JD> Binkley style. JD> I cannot get it to allow me provide a file forward for two of my JD> links. I've worked around it, to allow an NC that I connect with, to JD> route his netseg to the RC, with whom I also connect. Being able to JD> offer this service is what drew my attention to configuring Squish to JD> allow it. JD> I've reviewed : JD> ForwardFrom [FILE] [...] and that general area in JD> Squish.doc JD> along with: JD> Route [NoArc] [File] [...] and that area JD> of Squish.doc. JD> Apparently both are needed. JD> The symptom: JD> It seems like Squish still wants to read and use the path to the file JD> that is on the subject line, as it came in from the sender. Of course, JD> this most likely points to some dir that does not exist on my system. JD> :) The best I can get it to log is: SQSH File attach `D:\BT\In\I' does JD> not exist! JD> The subject line was: Subj : I:\xxxNET\NETxxx.xxx JD> 'D:\BT\IN\' *is* the path to my inbound ... so it was trying. :) JD> However, it looks like it starts to tack on the orginal subject line, JD> then quits. JD> The .hlo file Squish created contained a line : D:\BT\In\I JD> And to even get it to do this much, I had to comment out JD> ForwardTo WORLD in Squish.cfg. I use this for normal netmail JD> forwarding, and need it. JD> I had in place ForwardTo File 1:13/0 JD> only. This would not be enough for normal JD> operation. JD> Has anyone else experienced these things with Squish set up in a Bink JD> style system? If so, and you overcame it, please direct me. Maybe JD> I've misinterpretted the docs somehow.... JD> Has anyone ever successfully used Squish's documented file forwarding JD> of routed netmails with file attaches, with a Bink style system? If JD> so, I'd really like to see the pertinent parts of your Squish.cfg and JD> Route.cfg. JD> Else, to whomever is working on new versions of Squish, please take JD> note of this. Thank you. I'll be happy to re-do my experiments with JD> any config you like, and report. JD> Thanks Matt --- * Origin: Thunderdome Server Project - http://fido.thunderdome.ws/ (1:106/1) .