Subj : PktSort Broken?
To   : Don Guy
From : Roy J. Tellason
Date : Wed Dec 12 2001 08:17 pm

Don Guy wrote in a message to All:

 DG> Greetings All!

 DG> I vaguely remember a PktSort thread a few months ago, but all I
 DG> have on hand are a few short messages which appear to be a search
 DG> for its author. 

 DG> In any case, at some point in time it appears to have died on my
 DG> system.  I know neither how nor when.  I noticed it when the
 DG> traffic in a local echo picked up recently, and reply linking was
 DG> producing an interesting sequence. :-) 

 DG> True enough, my logs are showing "PSRT 0 messages were processed in
 DG> 0 seconds." Did I break something, or has PktSort gone the way of
 DG> the dinosaurs? 

I dunno,  it still works fine here...

Here's a snip from my log file:

  11 Dec 21:34:03 PSRT 830 messages were processed in 12 seconds. (69/sec)
  11 Dec 21:34:03 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  11 Dec 23:37:34 PSRT 12 messages were processed in 1 seconds. (12/sec)
  11 Dec 23:37:34 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  12 Dec 01:53:41 PSRT 10 messages were processed in 0 seconds.
  12 Dec 01:53:41 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  12 Dec 04:07:40 PSRT 271 messages were processed in 2 seconds. (135/sec)
  12 Dec 04:07:40 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  12 Dec 07:01:47 PSRT 1 messages were processed in 0 seconds.
  12 Dec 07:01:47 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  12 Dec 14:11:55 PSRT 2 messages were processed in 0 seconds.
  12 Dec 14:11:55 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.
  12 Dec 18:05:36 PSRT 289 messages were processed in 2 seconds. (144/sec)
  12 Dec 18:05:36 PSRT 0 messages were split into 0 parts.

Are you feeding it raw packets,  or asking squish to feed them to it?  I know 
that the original docs had some sort of modifications to compress.cfg,  I think 
it was,  and I ended up not doing it that way,  not at all.

--- 
 * Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615)

.