Subj : Charger
To   : ROY J. TELLASON
From : TOM WALKER
Date : Wed Jun 15 2005 10:55 am

RJT>RJT> TW>  I must have mistated my Question. I am Fimilat with "AA" matterie
RJT>RJT> TW> and  "AAA" battereis but don't recal the "A" designation for MANY
RJT>RJT> TW> years and  was unaware they were even still being manfactured.

RJT>RJT>I don't remember ever actually seeing an "A" battery designated as
RJT>RJT>such in terms of a specific size,  mostly they were designated that
RJT>RJT>way because of their use (filament/heater current) along with "B"
RJT>RJT>(plate voltage) and "C" (bias) back when.

RJT>TW> That was my Point, Perhaps being a little picky but hrtew "A"
RJT>TW> battery only existed as it applied to the Old Vucuum Tube Filiment
RJT>TW> Batteries.  NIOT as an individual Cell like the "AA" and "AAA"

RJT>There must've been an "A" cell at some point,  or the system wouldn't make
RJT>sense...

 One would think so. And it would have been a size inbetween the "AA"
 and the "C" for the system to be consistant. BUT I so far have found
 NO trace of it.
 WHICH brings up another question. WHAT ever happened to the "B"
 Battery? :-) :-)
---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ This note from El Cajon California USA
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)

.