Subj : Freebies To : ROY J. TELLASON From : CHARLES ANGELICH Date : Wed May 04 2005 05:20 am 123c5f2badda tech Hello Roy - --8<--cut WC>> BTW neigther LINKS nor LYNX would open the site :-( WC>> Charles got in with a later release of Firefox amd a WC>> reload. RJT> Some sites are just *so* bad. I was talking to somebody RJT> last night about one, that has the gall to use the word RJT> "global" in their name -- and which has been a PITA for RJT> several years now. I heard about it, went to check it out, RJT> and could only get so far with it, which was a shame, RJT> because they seemed to offer some certifications and a bit RJT> of training material. So I wrote them about it, and got RJT> told that "they only worked with IE and Netscape and I RJT> should install one of those". To which I responded "This RJT> is bullshit" and every email from that point onwards RJT> carried that subject line. :-) I'm not saying the website is right or that you are wrong for being annoyed with them but from their perspective they had IEx capability (90% of the browsers in use) and Netscape (at that time possibly another 5%)? Only a very small percentage of users (other browsers) were having problems - or so it might seem. RJT> Fast forward a couple of years. Now they have a "browser RJT> capability test" that you have to get past to use the site. "Browser sniffer" - few of these are complete and many are quite poorly written. RJT> Their list of "ok" browsers also includes Mozilla, but my RJT> copy of firefox, which is based on Mozilla, wouldn't get RJT> past it. I'm not familiar enough with FF to know where to change the browser ident but there _should_ be a way to have FF ident as 'mozilla'? RJT> It barfed on the browser name, it barfed on the version RJT> number (!), and it barfed on such things as me not having RJT> flash enabled/installed. Excuse me? WTF to I need that for? FLASH is a pain but to be objective the lack of uniformity of the 'majors' for embedding a player doesn't help web builders write the proper codes for rm, wmv, or mpg videos. FLASH OTOH is reputed to have remained more consistent from version to version and is quite compact for both sound and video. I'm only trusting other people's opinions on this since I don't use any FLASH on my webpages. :-) RJT> So I'll find my info elsewhere... RJT> You could talk to those guys, and see if they can possibly RJT> understand the problem with the site, and if they won't RJT> change it, then that speaks volumes toward their attitude RJT> in general, and they are probably best avoided anyhow. Again, it's sloppy web design/code and shouldn't be done that way but with 95% of the people's browsers accepting the code getting them to spend more time/money on the website might be like the flea thinking it owns the dog. ;-) > > , , > o/ Charles.Angelich \o , > <| |> __o/ > / > USA, MI < \ __\__ --- * ATP/16bit 2.31 * .... DOS the Ghost in the Machine! http://www.devedia.com/dosghost/ * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140) .