Subj : DOS TCP/IP and zmodem To : Charles Angelich From : Howard Eisenberger Date : Thu Sep 14 2000 11:16 am -=> CHARLES ANGELICH wrote to HOWARD EISENBERGER <=- HE>> dialup to local FreeNet (FreePort menu) - telnet to bbs - HE>> zmodem download failed * - telnet to 2nd FreeNet - zmodem HE>> download failed * - kermit download successful HE>> dialup to unix (BSD) shell account at ISP - telnet to bbs - HE>> zmodem download failed * - telnet -8 to bbs - zmodem download HE>> successful - telnet to bbs, set binary - zmodem download HE>> successful HE> * by setting "escape control characters yes" in the my DOS HE> terminal program's (Conex) built-in zmodem, these tests were HE> successful. CA> I'm curious about what hardware you are using with CONEX and what CA> transfer rates you can achieve when compared to a direct dialup CA> transfer using the same hardware with CONEX. Can you also upload CA> using CONEX with this setup? FWIW, I used my P133 and 28.8 ext. Courier. I only tested this once or twice. Not surprisingly, speeds were slower (up to 33%) than direct dialup. I tried one zmodem upload, and it failed (of course). CA> I can download using zmodem from Internet telnetable BBS but, so far, CA> uploading using zmodem is a no-go here and I'm using OMEN TECH CA> software so it's not the zmodem at my end that is the problem. 8( I have been able to upload (using ztelnet) in Linux, but not in DOS. As far as I am concerned, while zmodem is fine for straight dialup, it is not reliable over telnet. I only used it for these tests, since it seemed to be the only choice from a "telnet gateway". I had a look at the Boston Library Consortium (www.blc.org) and Boston Public Library (www.bpl.org) homepages, but couldn't find information about modem access. I think I've spent more than enough time with this. Howard Eisenberger Ottawa, Canada .... DOS TCP/IP * http://www.ncf.ca/~ag221/dosppp.html -+- MultiMail/IBMPcDos v0.36 --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-1 * Origin: Mach2 Systems (1:342/3) .