Subj : Re: unbaja
To   : Angus McLeod
From : Finnigann
Date : Sun Sep 11 2005 06:03 pm

-=> Angus McLeod wrote to Deuce <=-

 AM>   Re: unbaja
 AM>   By: Deuce to Angus McLeod on Sat Sep 10 2005 22:46:00

 >  > Why not add a few more known names to the getvar() function?
 >
 > Err... 'cause Synchronet doesn't know any others?
 >
 > I'm not sure what you're asking.

 AM> People will presumably be unbaja-ing source code that contains
 AM> variables *other* than the built-in variables.  You could include a
 AM> handful of likely candidates, such as:

 AM> 	a, b, c, f, i, j, k, p, q, s, x, y, z, buf, buffer, cnt,
 AM> count,
 AM> 	hnd, handle, str, wk, wrk, work, fname, filename, val, value

 AM> and so forth.  If you used a look-up table instead of a switch, you
 AM> could even externalize the table at some later date, allowing for user
 AM> defined entries...

 AM> Pay no attention -- just rambling on at the mouth...

*I* like the way you explain things. I can follow your train of thought most of
the time.


.... Guarantee my safety? Bill Gates can't even guarantee Windows. - J Crichton
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS   One Hellofa BBS    telnet://bnb.synchro.net

.