Subj : Re: The FUTURE To : Finnigann From : Time Warrior Date : Tue Sep 13 2005 11:41 am From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet To: Finnigann Re: Re: The FUTURE By: Finnigann to Time Warrior on Tue Sep 13 2005 10:34 am > TW> From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet > > TW> What he means is... > > If DM does this it will be a standard. If I do it and you do it but diffe > > then when someone asks about such and such a file and how it's supposed t > > we will get different but possible correct answers. (Unless you are posti > > (-: ) > Except for the last part, is it not so? Not really. If DM decides to accept a peice of third party code or contributution then it's official. If not, it's a third party application. Pretty simple concept. > > TW> #1 - The docs directory is quite a mess. This can be easily fixed by > > TW> ANYONE who would rather organize it and submit it to you rather than > > TW> piss and moan about it. > > See what I mean? Nice of you to provide an example in the same message > > I just had some suggestions and want to share them. > > I have one for you too... but you prolly have already heard it. > TW> That was the most uncreative copout i've ever read in my life. lol Ok > TW> well maybe not *THE* most uncreative but it comes close. The reason > TW> you've made your request is because of the fact that *NO ONE* has done > TW> it. Otherwise what would be the need for the request, eh? > No ne has done it because it is a huge task. BUT it would be harder for some > not as familiar with the saftware as say DM is. Organizing the docs directory is a huge task? Only Rob can do it? It would be no more or less tedeous than putting any other docs about anything else in order. > I wouldn't put myself at his level of understanding. Some people have as gre > a working kowledge of some parts of Sync as DM (maybe) but no one knows it a > like DM. If your level of understanding was the same as your level of assumptions and arrogance, you'd surpass DM by leaps and bounds :-) > TW> Anyone can help with Synchronet. What you said makes you sound like a > TW> complete fool. You're basically saying that Rob has to oversee > TW> EVERYTHING and that people like oh gee I dunno Deuce, RM, Cyan, etc... > TW> can't just take it upon themselves to submit things like CVS updates > TW> for gee I dunno Synchweb, The Synchronet IRCD, etc... > No, ANYONE can't. They must demonstrat that fact first before any thing is > accepted.Duece and Cyan and others have done this. I'm (for example) am clos > to the user/sysop level. I need clear consise docs and help files for nearly > every aspect of Sync operation. AND it's still evolving [sync - not me] Sync > has far outstripped the DOCS. Files are added as they are needed but it seem > to me that there lacks some organization (bear in mind my levels) Anyone can't? That makes no sense. There are tons of third party apps for Synchronet. Some DM has made officially a part of Synch, alot he hasn't. Whatever your smoking please don't share. lol > TW> Also, look at all of the mod packs that are out there? I do beleive > TW> there have even been more than just a few mods that have been created > TW> that have ended up officially in Synchronet because Rob happened to > TW> like them. > Yes the talent pool interested in Sync developement is a large group. *I'm* > interested, I just have nothing much to contribute (not zero but closer than > say YOU) Really? I've made mods, run a modded bbs, two echomail networks (for over 10 years for one of them), and have been the only one (other than Frank) to cooperatively try to update and release a global spam filter. Just what have you done other than piss and moan about issues that don't actually exist? What contribution, other than to your own ego, have *you* made? > TW> As for correct answers or not -- this coming from the so-called Sysop > TW> who still fails to understand the problems and possibilities within QWK > TW> Conference # Crossing. > TW> I never said your request for a tree change was wrong. I simply said > TW> you love to piss, moan and bitch. So thank you for proving *my point* > TW> with your lame excuses to satisfy your pathetic ego and attempt to put > TW> me down. > WTF are you going on about. I have read a few messages from you in the same > vien. After being told no, you have continued to ask. Perhaps your just a ca > of knowing what your talking about because *You're* the expert. I've never claimed to be the expert. You're just mad when people don't have the same opinion as you do. In short, you're a hosile pissy bitch and trust me -- I'm NOWHERE NEAR the only one who has this opinion of you. I'm just the only one who on occassion, is amused by you enough to voice it directly to you as opposed to behind your back. Most simply twit filter you in silence. > TW> It didn't work but nice try tho. You get an "E" for "Effort" :-) > You say. But I care little for your opinion of me. If you didn't care you wouldn't be trying to prove to me your non-existant points. > or of anything much in general... I'll agree with you here. I think if you had a slogan, it would be "I bitch, therefore I am!" lol :-) -- .---------------------------------------------------------------. | [TiME WaRRiOR] aka [Dave Kelso] AIM: Twar782 | +o Malkavia BBS | | www : synchsupport.net - malkaviabbs.com - xpresit.net | | www$: josephsjewelersonline.com - preferedinsurance.com | | @: time.warrior@malkaviabbs. com | \______________________________________________________________/ --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76 * Malkavia - Chicago, IL - telnet://malkaviabbs.com --- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83 .