Subj : Re: BBS & Linux & Bastille To : alt.bbs.synchronet From : Sinister x Date : Fri Aug 05 2005 03:08 am From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet As a Fedora Core 3 runner I can tell you this, if you're running se-linux on your box, you're going to have troubles doing just about ANYTHING. I would probably disable it altogether (unless you really feel like reading through tons of forums on how to get it working), as I think I had to disable it on mine in order to get telnet working at all since it's considered a security vulnerability. "Arpawolf" wrote in message news:42F119D9.32991.sync@vert.synchro.net... > Greetings, > > Been a while since I've posted. Now having some issues with being able to > get > sbbs up and running. > > I run Fedora Core 2, and recently installed Bastille (Security hardening) > software for my system. Since then, I can't get telnet to 'bind' to the > telnet > port. ;/ > > I've doubled check, that I can telnet into my system from a remote site > and > telnet 'accepts' connections. Yet, can not get sbbs to bind to telnet > port. > > Maybe bastille changed permissions on /sbbs ? Anyone have any thoughts > suggestions? BTW, what are the default permissions for /sbbs and its > recursive > dirs/files..? > > Thanks, > BTW would like to continue running Bastille, but really wish to continue > utilizing Synchronet.. its a gem ;) > > JP > ______________________________________________________ > / \ > Disclaimer: " These opinions are my own, though for a > small fee they be yours too." > -- John Pollock > \______________________________________________________/ > > > > > > > > > > > --- Synchronet 3.12b-Win32 NewsLink 1.83 > * Vertrauen - Anaheim Hills, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net --- Synchronet 3.12b-Win32 NewsLink 1.83 .