Subj : Re: Synchronet can maybe.
To   : Digital Man
From : Darkytoo
Date : Mon Aug 01 2005 09:19 pm

  Re: Re: Synchronet can maybe.
  By: Digital Man to Time Warrior on Thu Jul 28 2005 01:57 am

 >   Re: Re: Synchronet can maybe.
 >   By: Time Warrior to Tracker1 on Tue Jul 26 2005 08:02 am
 > 
 >  >  > > I don't understand why Synchronet will not run on OSX. OSX is Linux 
 >  >  > > **KNOW** Synchronet will run on LInux!
 >  >
 >  >  > OSX is *NOT* Linux.. it's based on Darwin (BSD derivative with a micro
 >  >  > core) ... Also, the biggest issue is that the mac processors (outside 
 >  >  > new intel/x86 version of OSX for developers) use a big-endian byte ord
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > AFAIK, Linux, BSD, etc... are all originally based on Unix :-)
 >  >
 >  > So was DOS for that mater. I think DOS was basically like "Unix for Dummi
 >  > lol :-)
 > 
 > No, DOS v1.0 was basically a clone of CP/M. DOS 2.0 introduced hierarchical
 > directory structures (ala Unix), but it was still more CP/M than Unix.
 > 
 >  > DOS is the only command prompt OS (that I know of) besides Linux, Unix,
 >  > BSD, etc... type OS's.
 > 
 > Most OSes have a "command prompt" of some type.
 > 
 >                                                   digital man
 > 
 > Snapple "Real Fact" #143:
 > Q is the only letter in the alphabet not appearing in the name of any U.S. s
 > 
Apparently MacOS technically didn't.  That's one of the things that makes it
the most secure web server platform because you can't gain root access
remotely.
Twisted Citadel: Telnet://Citadel.gotdns.com
It's 2005, gotta have a blog: http://darkyblog.blogspot.com

---
 þ Synchronet þ Twisted Citadel - Citadel.dynip.com Norcross, GA 2K00L

.