Subj : Synchronet can maybe...?
To   : Time Warrior
From : Digital Man
Date : Mon Jul 25 2005 09:00 pm

  Re: Synchronet can maybe...?
  By: Time Warrior to Digital Man on Wed Jul 20 2005 03:01 am

 > From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet
 > 
 >   To: Digital Man
 >   Re: Synchronet can maybe...?
 >   By: Digital Man to Time Warrior on Wed Jul 20 2005 03:43 am
 > 
 >  > Oh my gawd, do you believe that the moon landing was faked too?
 > 
 >  Neither yes nor no. I'll spare you my opinion on that one. lol
 > 
 >  > autoexec.nt and config.nt are there for when you run an NTVDM (NT Virtual
 >  > Machine) session, they're used to setup the "Virtual DOS" environment for
 >  > programs! If you don't ever run any DOS programs, you don't need those fi
 > 
 >  > Wow, you're just full of misinformation today!
 > 
 > Thank you for the explanation however I said what I said mostly as opinion
 > and less as fact. Hence the QUESTION I asked, which was:
 > 
 >  "then HOW COME autoexec.bat and config.sys were  removed, but instead,
 > hidden in the Windows directory and changed to autoexec.nt and
 > config.nt? :-)"
 > 
 > The words HOW and COME were used and the question ended with, low and behold
 > a question mark.
 > 
 > THANK YOU for the answer, seeing as I did *ask a question*.

Immediately following your completely false STATEMENTS:

"Windows 95 through ME needed Dos 7, Dos 8, etc..."
FALSE: there was no "DOS 7, DOS 8".

"now some say the NT Kernel isn't built on top of Dos and others say it is."
FALSE: No one but you "says it is".

"No *real* way to prove it"
FALSE: There are *many* "real" ways to prove it. But it'd be like proving that
the moon isn't made of cheese. It'd be a stupid point to prove.

"and i'm sure it's not something M$ would be too quick to admit."
FALSE: That's just absurd.

So are you saying that the fact that you followed these utterly false
statements with a question meant that you were in fact not making any statments
at all? Should I treat every message of yours that contains a question mark as
complete conjecture devoid of any actual statements of fact?

If you think by just removing your false statements from your quoted text will
somehow change the history of the thread, you're wrong (again). <sigh>

                                                  digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #52:
11% of people in the world are lefthanded.

.