Subj : Re: Synchronet can maybe.
To   : Deuce
From : Tracker1
Date : Fri Jul 22 2005 08:31 am

Deuce wrote:
> Actually, it runs and appears to be correct, but it most likely broke all kinds
> of things I didn't think of... some of the bits from the dark ages of v2 and
> possibly even v1 were diddled with quickly without looking too deeply into
> exactly what was happening... any time you do that, you can almost guarantee
> something broke.  If it ONLY broke it for BE stuff that's be fine, but there's
> a good chance (I'd say around 80%) that it would ALSO break something on x86
> stuff.  Because of that, it's not something to dump in just before a branch is
> closed for new development.  :-)

Not to mention that JavaScript is endian dependant as well... :(  ..which is 
kind if disappointing that a scripting language relies on endian-ness of the OS..

-- 
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net
icq: 4935386  -  AIM/AOL: azTracker1  -  Y!: azTracker1  -  MSN/Win: (email)

---
 þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it

.